Re: autoconf not hard-link safe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> autoconf (more precisely autom4te AFAICT) isn't hardlink safe..
> 
> That is, if I have a two or three source trees hardlinked together (to
> save space) with only differing source files not linked, running
> autoconf leaves configure (and possibly other files) still hardlinked.

Can you really expect tools like Autoconf to break hard links in this
situation?  Most POSIX utilities are required to leave output files
hard-linked, so there's good precedent for Autoconf's behavior.  Even
if we altered Autoconf, that still leaves the sh, cp, etc. as tools
that won't break the hard links.



[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux