On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Bernd Jendrissek wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello all > > I am wondering how widespread the use of the autotools is - particularly > among projects that are *not* GNU or other Free Software, or even "Open > Source" but not-quite Free. IOW how many in-house completely locked-up > proprietary packages use them? My proprietary commercial project uses it. From my experience Autotools help keep the build scipts clean. Also you can easily find many examples of how to implement something with Autotools and such a knowledge base usually does not exist for a home-grown build system. Autotools also cut down the training and adaptation time --- would you hire a developer who cannot build autoconfiscated package? AFAICT Autotools are not best suited for releasing binary packages, but I would not say that this is a limitation. I use Autotools only on *NIX, I would expect that the view is different when you look through the Windows. BR Grzegorz > > It's probably a bit hard to tell, these packages being uber-secret and > all. Any (gu)estimates? > > bernd > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE/cvBN/FmLrNfLpjMRArGZAJ96Dha4MLCDIg14EInt6U8AeF0nNQCfQZ73 > DIh59vdwn21jlWujB7ribwY= > =Me6j > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ################################################################## # Grzegorz Jakacki Huada Electronic Design # # Senior Engineer, CAD Dept. 1 Gaojiayuan, Chaoyang # # tel. +86-10-64365577 x2074 Beijing 100015, China # # Copyright (C) 2002 Grzegorz Jakacki, HED. All Rights Reserved. # ##################################################################
