On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:09:17PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I need to settle on a solution to use in GCC until an updated > > autoconf is available. > > Thanks. Your change good to me, so I installed it. I documented it a > bit differently though. Here's what I installed; this patch also > handles an unrelated doc issue with test -L. Thank you! Anyway, I'm back (already...). If you thought something was strange about my explanation, well, it was. This handles headers which generate preprocessor warnings, but not headers which generate _compiler_ warnings, which is the new way of checking for headers anyway. So I've only postponed the problem, not solved it. I'm not quite sure what to do about it... a generic "strict" mode where warnings from the compiler are also rejected? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
