> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:19:06PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: >> At the origin I was considering that AC_CONFIG_M4_DIR was >> automatically passed to m4 as a -I, so instead of >> m4_include([config/init.m4]) etc. you'd have m4_include([init.m4]). > Isn't there a chicken'n'egg problem? How can you trace for > AC_CONFIG_M4_DIR if you need the result to run m4 properly? Right, there was something like that :)
