Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Guido Draheim wrote:
of another file. In all other cases, I'm quite fine... what features are overdue by your records, Thomas?
I suppose you could look at the cvs version and answer your own question. I recall seeing a half-dozen serious bugs reported - and fixed - since 2.57, making the difference at least as much as from 2.54 to 2.57. (2.55 & 2.56 were blunders, of course - read the changelog).
Hmm, I might wonder what your "serious bugs" are, it looks like a lot of those are portability fixes, which is not quite the same as serious problems of the architecture. Anyway, my question was more to what happens to be hurting _your_ projects on the platforms that _you_ are using. Apart from that, yes, it seems the code base itself uses quite a number of new algorithmics which makes it quite a difference indeed. So I wonder what that would do to my projects *sigh* call it 2.60 to be sure everyone notices?
cheers, -- guido http://AC-Archive.sf.net GCS/E/S/P C++/++++$ ULHS L++w- N++@ d(+-) s+a- r+@>+++ y++ 5++X-
