Re: Update on "Yum install fails on Solaris, reports success" thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That's a typo, sorry - #4 should read "4.7.1". Same problems/bug when using YUM (scriptlet failure).

--- On Tue, 12/1/09, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Update on "Yum install fails on Solaris, reports success" thread
To: yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 9:41 AM

On Monday 30 November 2009 04:29:24 pm Joshua Burns wrote:
> Hi - my apologies for the premature send.
>
> After building versions
>
> 1) 4.4.2.3 stock from dev site
> 2) 4.4.2.3-18 RHEL patches
> 3) 4.1.7 stock from dev site, and then finally
> 4) 5.1.9 from rpm5.org site
curious as to why you did not try 4.7 series that is in fedora.

Dennis

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum

_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux