On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
On 11/09/2009 04:45 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
second:
a command-line pipes/parsing "friendly" yum-util.
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/playing-with-another-yum-util/
Nice example of how to make a yum utils, kind of a yum-cli light :) to make
life easier for pearl heads :)
you need to check to return code from buildtransaction and bail out not 2 :).
nod.
showing packages in a way to be handled by pipes is ok, but i don't feel good
about install/update/remove packages in that way, we allready have yum shell
for that, maybe we should work on making the return codes better in yum-cli
instead.
making the return codes better is fine - except that it won't cover the
'machine parseable' part and I routinely get pinged about that. It gets
old.
-sv
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
