> Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> writes: > > Hello, > > > > Retrieving provides from rpmdb gives unversioned ones to me with flags=0 > > (Fedora 10, rpm 4.6.1), and rangeCompare() does not do the right thing > > with them - it has a special case for None only. The attached patch > > fixes it for me. > > I added the formatRequire() patch and then this one, and some more > tests ... Thanks. > and then realized that the formatRequire() one is bad > because if you have: > > # pkgA > Require: foo >= > > # pkgB > Provide: foo < 1.0-1 > > ...then you need to know that there is a >= pkgA require, because it > fails. Hmm, I don't understand, could you elaborate/rephrase? "foo >=" without a version doesn't make sense to me, for example rpmbuild doesn't let "Requires: foo >=" pass. Is it actually possible to have such relations that have name, the = >= and friends bits, but no version in packages? In the commit message where the patch was reverted, it says "This isn't right ... Eg. =>, (None, None, None) VS. < (1, 2, 3) is false.". Isn't formatRequire() just for formatting stuff for humans to read, what does it have to do with actual version comparisons? _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
