Re: Missing GPG public key - rpm basics!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard.S.Abbott@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I am not sure what this means - the pkg you have is just a src rpm.
You still need to build it.
First, if a new message is related to a previous one, then can you please reply to the appropriate message in the previous thread you made {trimming any irrelevant info}. This means that threaded email readers {that most list readers use}, will be able to automatically list the newer message with the old thread.

I do have file I downloaded with the src called yum-2.6.0.tar.gz.  I
know this is a zipped file
gzipped infact.

but not sure how it is associated with the
src file.
It isn't. It's the other way around:
A .src.rpm contains the original source code {eg the .tar.gz}, along with any patches or other needed files, and a .spec file. A src.rpm can be used to rebuild a package to suit a particular system or achitecture. The output is a binary .rpm

The .spec file is used by rpmbuild to create binary rpm packages eg yum-2.6.0.rpm.

Sorry about these questions, I am a Wintel SA, I am use to double
clicking on the exe file to install software.
In a distribution based on rpm, the install software {ie pre-built software including the executables, configs and disk layout} is inside a binary .rpm. On an rpm system with a GUI rpm package manager, you can just click the binary .rpm file to invoke the package manager.

So the question is: are you making this harder for yourself than needs to be ?
What distribution are you using ?

DaveT.
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux