On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:09 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 09:36 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > > > >> seth vidal wrote: > >> > >>> Yah, that's the problem - it's a bug in 3.2.16 - it's been fixed in git > >>> and will be out in the next yum release. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Thanks for the info. I assume this bug also affects x86_64? > >> I'll be updating my yum installation to the git snapshot then. > >> > >> > > > > yah - easy work around, though. just install-by-arch. > > > > > > Meaning (for example) "yum install redhat-lsb.i386" instead of just "yum > install redhat-lsb"? > That works, but there are cases when the old "install both arch" is > desirable. > > In my case I create a custom distro based on RHEL5, where the x86_64 ISO > doesn't contain i386 rpms. This is mainly to save space (so it can fit > into a 700-MB CD). > If users need i386 packages, with the old behavior I can simply tell > them to do "yum install `rpm -qa`", and yum will pull i386 version of > x86_64 packages installed, if available. > > PS : I just tried snapshot ca3dd56f5bbaa01fc21846aec7366d6a22c9335e, > latest from gitweb. multilib_policy=all still doesn't work. I assume the > public git repository isn't updated yet. > You want to make sure you get the yum-3_2_X branch from git, not master/HEAD. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
