On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:51:45PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > > Updating : xulrunner ######################### [1/2] > > > > > Error unpacking rpm package > > > > > xulrunner-1.9-0.beta3.22.nightly20080215.fc9.i386 > > > > > error: unpacking of archive failed on > > > > > file /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9pre/dictionaries: cpio: rename > [...] > > yes, rpm gives us no way of knowing otherwise in the python layer, > That's so nice of RPM. Is there an open bug for this general issue? <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216221> is it, I suppose. So anyway, not a Yum problem intrinsically, but something we need to get fixed in RPM. With the new world order there, is it reasonable to wait for that, or should I work on the double-check plugin? > Failing that, I guess a plugin could check to see if what was claimed to be > installed is actually installed when the transaction is done.... -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
