Re: yum 3.2.x on CentOS 5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 04:01:07PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> > > of 3.0.x. I did a similar thing for our older releases, and it turned out
> > > to be a) the right choice and b) full of surprises. Anything in particular I
> > > should be aware of this time around? Am I okay with the default sqlite
> > > version (sqlite-3.3.6)? What about python-sqlite (no longer a separate
> > > package in Python 2.5, I see....)
> > No hints, eh. No problem, I'll just charge ahead blindly. :)
> B.t.w., your original remarks "a) the right choice" and "b) full of
> surprises" sounded pretty much like a contradiction to me... ;-)

Thankfully, none of them were unappeasable surprises, but yes, I'm hoping
for a least an equal measure of "a" with a lot less "b" this time around. :)

So far, the only issues I've found are "don't upgrade yum-metadata-parser
first" and "createrepo 0.4.10 works differently with symlinks".

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux