RE: Using YUM to manage S/W distros other than linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Reaching the architecture review stage of my little project and rpm and
yum are still on the table. I decided to review this small thread and
came across

"if the os is managed by rpm all of the above are possible."

I may be mis-reading this but why would the OS have to be managed by rpm
to make the 'above' (now below) possible? I have whittled and hammered
down to red hat only OS support, for now, and rpm and yum are being used
on the target systems but I don't understand why the OS would have to be
managed by rpm to use rpm to transport other data.

Thanks

 

-----Original Message-----
From: yum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:yum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of seth vidal
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:11 PM
To: Yellowdog Updater, Modified
Subject: RE:  Using YUM to manage S/W distros other than linux

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 15:06 -0700, Gallie, Keith wrote:
> sv> what did you have in mind?
> 
> multi-site s/w release management; s/w meaning anything a developer 
> releases, perl, compiled exes, compiled libraries, documentation, etc.

if the os is managed by rpm all of the above are possible.

-sv


_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum




_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux