On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:13:00AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > Hmm. I wonder if the ones that broke were running 2.6.9-34.0.1.EL, and the > ones that didn't, 2.6.9-34.0.2.EL. I'll check into that. But even then, what (That's not it -- most or all were running 2.6.9-34.0.2.EL as they should have been.) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
