On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 15:38 -0500, Joshua Jensen wrote: > I see a rather large problem with having the official yum site's newest > stable branch having a bug like this. "Already fixed in Fedora" is good > for Fedora, but setting users expectations that the yum website isn't > where we are supposed to get the non-broken yum packages would be a good > thing. > > In lei of a 2.4.2 release, perhaps you could put a note in a README file > on http://linux.duke.edu/projects/yum/download/2.4/ saying "until 2.4.2 > please use yum 2.4.1 from Fedora" ? > wow, that's a lot more pain than just releasing a 2.4.2 -sv
