-----Original Message----- From: yum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:yum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of yum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 10:30 PM To: yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Yum Digest, Vol 29, Issue 13 Send Yum mailing list submissions to yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to yum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at yum-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Yum digest..." Today's Topics: 1. no module named yum (Jan Waszink) 2. yum error (alvin l lobiano) 3. Re: "yum list" shows only a few package (Brian Long) 4. Re: Yum error (Brian Long) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 23:24:14 +0100 From: Jan Waszink <j.waszink@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [Yum] no module named yum To: yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <1134253454.7806.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain Hi there I have problem installing yum 2.2, 2.3 or 2.4 under Fedora Core 2. Installation seems to proceed well, both from the tar.gz package and from the src.rps. However, when I try to start yum I keep getting the error message No module named yum from Python, whatever way of installing I try. I have followed the advice to use the src.rpm, but this makes no difference. It happens with yum-2.2.2-1, 2.3.2-1, 2.4.0-1, 2.4.1-1 Apparently a file named yummodule.so is missing from /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/. I have also tried Python 2.4, without effect. What can I do to get it there? Is it possible simply to transplant yummodule.so from another machine, and if so, where can I find a copy? Thanks for all help, Jan ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:25:29 +0000 From: alvin l lobiano <all-ndi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [Yum] yum error To: yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <1134357930.3531.1.camel@all> Content-Type: text/plain I was having a problem installing yum. I think I have installed it properly but then I got this error message There was a problem importing one of the Python modules required to run yum. The error leading to this problem was: No module named yum Please install a package which provides this module, or verify that the module is installed correctly. It's possible that the above module doesn't match the current version of Python, which is: 2.3.4 (#1, Feb 2 2005, 11:44:49) [GCC 3.4.3 20041212 (Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4)] If you cannot solve this problem yourself, please send this message to <yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. thanks in advance... ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:47:08 -0500 From: Brian Long <brilong@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Yum] "yum list" shows only a few package To: "Yellowdog Updater, Modified" <yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1134398828.4365.18.camel@brilong-lnx> Content-Type: text/plain On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 09:43 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote: > On 12/11/05, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Dec 2005, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > O > > >>> 1. I didn't know of any distros that were shipping an ia32e kernel. > > >>> Curious > > >> > > >> RHEL 3 has separate x86_64 and ia32e kernels... > > > > > > RHEL 3 ships with x86(ia32) kernels, and x86_64 kernels. not an ia32e kernel. > > > > > > This would lead me to question why you have x86_64 packages on an x86 > > > box, unless you're referring to EMT64 xeons as ia32e > > > > RHEL 3 x86_64 has both x86_64 and ia32e kernels. The ia32e one is for > > emt64, never mind the bizarre name... > > > > - Panu - > > > Ah, that clears it all up. Haven't had a chance to play with them yet, > but from what I've read/heard, I don't think I want to either. Definitely underwhelming with regards to performance in comparison to a similarly-configured Opteron-based system. :) /Brian/ -- Brian Long | | | IT Data Center Systems | .|||. .|||. Cisco Linux Developer | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:.. Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:18:22 -0500 From: Brian Long <brilong@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Yum] Yum error To: "Yellowdog Updater, Modified" <yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1134404302.4365.25.camel@brilong-lnx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 12:45 -0700, Greg Knaddison wrote: > On 12/9/05, Ken Ramey <kramey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for providing such a great tool to the user community. > > > > I am having a small problem on a new FC4 installation which was recently > > updated, using up2date. The error I am seeing is: > > > > I recommend you use the recommendations in the FAQ on searching the archives: > > http://wiki.linux.duke.edu/YumFaq Has anyone updated the man page to reference the FAQ before this email list? Maybe this would avoid so much repetition on the list. 2.4.0 has the following: ----------------------- SEE ALSO yum.conf (5) http://linux.duke.edu/yum/ BUGS There of course arenbt any bugs, but if you find any, they should be sent to the mailing list: yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or filed in bugzilla. ----------------------- I wonder if the BUGS area should mention the FAQ before the mailing list :) /Brian/ -- Brian Long | | | IT Data Center Systems | .|||. .|||. Cisco Linux Developer | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:.. Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum End of Yum Digest, Vol 29, Issue 13 ***********************************
