Sorry SV, original post to the archive was https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/2005-June/006811.html Missing Dependency: apel-xemacs >= 10.5 is needed by package wl-xemacs current version of apel-xemacs is 10.6-5 and from the output below apel-xemacs was obsoleted by xemacs-sumo.noarch I have no idea where to go or what to do next? Thanks for replying On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 06:19 -0600, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 22:56 -0600, Mike Kelley wrote: > > I too have the same problem and I am unsure what to do next here is > my > > list obsoletes output and it looks like you were right ... what > next? > > > > [root@spike@localhost ~]# yum list obsoletes > > Setting up repositories > > core 100% |=========================| 951 B > > 00:00 > > dag 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB > > 00:00 > > freshrpms 100% |=========================| 951 B > > 00:00 > > extras 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB > > 00:00 > > updates 100% |=========================| 951 B > > 00:00 > > updates-released 100% |=========================| 951 B > > 00:00 > > base 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB > > 00:00 > > Reading repository metadata in from local files > > primary.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 92 kB > > 00:00 > > updates-re: ################################################## > 276/276 > > Added 92 new packages, deleted 0 old in 0.83 seconds > > Obsoleting Packages > > xemacs-sumo.noarch 20050505-4.1 [extras] obsoletes > > ddskk-xemacs.noarch > > xemacs-sumo.noarch 20050505-4.1 [extras] obsoletes > > apel-xemacs.noarch > > xemacs-sumo.noarch 20050505-4.1 [extras] obsoletes > mew-xemacs.i386 > > ppracer.i386 0.3.1-4 [extras] obsoletes tuxracer.i386 > > cryptsetup-luks.i386 1.0-1 [core] obsoletes cryptsetup.i386 > > cryptsetup-luks.i386 1.0-1 [base] obsoletes cryptsetup.i386 > > cryptsetup-luks.i386 1.0-1 [core] obsoletes cryptsetup.i386 > > cryptsetup-luks.i386 1.0-1 [base] obsoletes cryptsetup.i386 > > [root@spike@localhost ~]# > > > > I've got no context here. What was the missing dep error message you > were seeing? > > -sv > > > >
