On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 08:02 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 21:59 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > > [Filed as Bugzilla bug 380.] This is a weird one. > 1. 'yet another'? What was the first one? The one with boost, where trying to do a yum update of the x86_64 package caused it to be removed and replaced with the i386 one. It's not clear (my memory is fuzzy) whether it was a problem with the boost packaging or an rpm bug, but it showed up as a yum problem. > 2. You don't have to file the bug AND post about it - either one will > do. OK, thanks. I assumed that the set of people watching the mailing list is much larger than the set who have Bugzilla notifications turned on at Duke, and I thought this might be of general interest. Won't do it again. <b -- Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
