> What about adding : > > - exactarchpkg - a limited set of packages to apply exactarch to if it is > set, instead of considering exactarch for all packages added. > I'm still a little hesitant to file bug reports over at Red Hat for the > packages that are still not noarch although they contain no binaries, or > even change my own which are in the same case, since I *know* it'll cause > breakage for the vast majority of users who have exactarch=1 set. 1. users can unset exactarch. I'd even be willing to make it a command option if it would be easier. 2. We may be getting to a place where the reason for exactarch is going away. It might be that distributions are well maintained enough and people are haphazardly building repository metadata so you will know if you have all the necessary arches. -sv
