[moving to yum's list] On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:43:25PM -0500, Phil Schaffner wrote: > Also a bit odd that the upgrade creates /etc/yum.repos.d but then yum20 > fails to use *.repo files there. Also had some confusion with the > disappearance of yum in favor of yum20 and having /var/cache/yum and > yum20. Some symlinks might be helpful. yum20 is yum 2.0.x, which has no *.repo functionality. yum20 is a compatibility/transition package for those that find bugs in yum >= 2.1.x and need a fast solution, or for those that need to access repos that have no yum-2.1 metadata. > > > But anyway, yum 2.1.x has some regression wrt yum20, see some bug > > > reports here: > > > > > > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=288 > > > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=289 > Seriously, since it has to do with Axel's packages and interactions > with config files, not just yum, No, the bugs are not in packaging, but in yum's resolve mechanism. Check the bug reports above. > would think it better to file at ATrpms bugzilla and let it be > pushed upstream if necessary. That's exactly what has already happened. The above have been filed in ATrpms bugzilla and found to be yum upstream bugs, which were carried to yum's list. If you like you can create a smaller testcase for Seth to debug. ATrpms washes its hands in innocence ;) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20041123/bf56fc0e/attachment.bin
