[Yum] [PATCH] Adds an excludedocs option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 08:57:55PM -0400, seth vidal alleged:
> On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 16:24 +0100, Steve Hill wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > 
> > The attached patch against yum 2.0.6 adds an excludedocs option.  
> > Specifying "excludedocs=1" in the confid file makes yum exclude the docs 
> > from the rpm install (like rpm --excludedocs).
> > 
> > It doesn't work on some badly written RPMs which either don't mark the 
> > docs as documentation or expect the docs to always be installed, but 
> > that's a problem with the RPMs themselves, not with yum.
> 
> So, your patch is fine - but I'm trying to figure out where to draw the
> line for options like these. I understand excludedocs - but if
> excludedocs comes in, why not --nodeps or --replacefiles?
> 
> I'm wondering if it wouldn't be worthwhile to have a yum rpm macros file
> so anything that anyone wants to set for the default yum rpm transaction
> set flags can be set there and not clutter up the yum config file with
> rpmts-specific actions.
> 
> Thoughts?

I've not tested this, but would adding "%_excludedocs 1" to your ~/.rpmmacros
have the same effect?

-- 
Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator
University of Southern California
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20040510/58b7f470/attachment.bin

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux