On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 03:09:56PM -0500, Robert G. Brown alleged: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, salvatore wrote: > > > > > >>The nature of such lists is that people usually only post when > > >>something is broken after they've tried very hard to make it work. It > > >>is therefore quite nice to hear from someone who finds that everything > > >>works after trying very hard to break it :) > > >> > > >> > > >To be honest I read his mail three times looking for the 'but'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > To be honest, I should have written one of these emails long ago. Yum > > has made this linux quasi-newbie's life much easier. > > Its a great tool thats much appreciated. > > There is a really classic link on the joy of providing "service" to the > masses wrt free software. It is worth a read -- in fact it could have > been written by God and it would still be apropos. > > It makes it clear that the occasional letter of praise is worth much to > the downtrodden maintainers: > > http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/faq.html#utone > > Hail Seth! Hail Michael! > > Aw, Hail... (remember I'm from the south...;-) > > rgb Then I need in too... Yum is awesome, I love it, it's made dealing with rpms on a 1000 node cluster very easy :) Thanks guys! -- Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator University of Southern California -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20040309/9bab752f/attachment.bin
