On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:32:47PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 12:30 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, seth vidal wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 12:08 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote: > > > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 11:38 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote: > > > > > > I noticed the same thing. I imagine everyone with x86_64 had it happen to > > > > > > them. > > > > > > I have exactarch=1 in mine. > > > > > What version of yum is this? > > > > 2.1.11 > > > > fedora core 3, release version > > > Can you test this on yum 2.1.12? > > > > Here's what I get on yum 2.1.11: > > > > Other Transactions: > > Obsoleting: boost.i386 0:1.31.0-9 with boost.i386 0:1.32.0-1.fc3 > > Obsoleting: boost.x86_64 0:1.31.0-9 with boost.i386 0:1.32.0-1.fc3 > > Obsoleting: boost-devel.x86_64 0:1.31.0-9 with boost.i386 0:1.32.0-1.fc3 > > > > ooooooooooookay > > so boost obsoletes boost? > > I'm going to go cry now. Thanks. > /me hands skvidal a hanky. snuffle up old boy! multilib is almost in production. wait for some extra special i386 on ia64 pain however, then perhaps clear sailing for a bit. BTW, qemu-arm WORKSFORME, underneath rpmbuild and rpm next agenda item. arch needs to die! die! die! ;-) 73 de Jeff -- Jeff Johnson ARS N3NPQ jbj@xxxxxxxxxx (jbj@xxxxxxx) Chapel Hill, NC
