On Friday 13 August 2004 09:49, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > > a. Bug free in every way > > > b. functionally equivalent to yum 2.0.X > > > c. testable but maybe not production-quality yet. > > > d. will eat your young and embarrass you in front of attractive > > > members of the gender of your choosing. > > > > May I ask for c? > > b will be hopefully before fedora core 3, final. Well, I'm living in a different (but at least rpm based) linux universe ;-) > c will be in about 2-3 weeks. most likely. This is exceptional good news. > I've been moving through a bunch of functions I needed to write > this week. There're a few things missing from my SuSE point of view. The most important one is the naming of kernel rpms. Should I prepare patches to just mangle this in local SuSE yum rpms or would you accept a new config option patch to specify such (similar to distroverpkg, but needs to be wildcard enabled)? Pete
