> Just out of curiosity, why 5? If state n+1 (S_{n+1}) depends only on
> S_{n} and nothing else, then doesn't
>
> S_{n+1} == S_{n}
>
> imply that
>
> S_{m} == S_{n} for all m > n?
>
> If that's the case,t then I would expect a single step with no change
> to be enough.
the reports are weird. I've had occasions where the type of resolution
steps will change in between for no obvious reason.
5 seemed about average for what I could trust w/no change.
-sv
