On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, seth vidal wrote: > > 2) is there any value to the "name" value other than being human > > readable for public consumption? > > human consumption is, imo, valuable. i don't disagree, i just wondered whether the arbitrary "name" string in a [server] section was used for anything other than aesthetics. apparently not, which is fine. i just didn't want to document it incorrectly. thanks. rday