Quasi-legal YUM question: If we use Yum on a production RH 9 server, and point to a 3rd-party repository, no subscription fees are due to Red Hat, correct? I know it doesn't make logical sense that RH would be able to collect a fee for applying maintenance to a box even though the maintenance doesn't come from Red Hat; has anyone checked the wording of the License agreement for Red Hat 9? I'm all for tools that do a better job than those you have to pay for... we just have to make sure it works from a tech and legal standpoint. Can anyone shed some light here? ----------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely on the information contained in it. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the email from your system. Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you. Lend Lease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s) are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. Lend Lease may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance with its Email Policy. Please note that our servers may not be located in your country.
