On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 12:40, Jeff Smith wrote: > If I understood the suggestion correctly, he was saying to share the > header cache via nfs, not the repos themselves. Each update on each > machine will be trying to update the information in the cache. And hell > could break loose if they start fighting each other for control. > > But for the sake of simplicity, I like Rick's suggestion. Damn the > sharing and duplicate effort all over the place. :-) Would not "yum -C" eliminate all chances of multiple updates to the cache. One machine could do the leading updates. The rest would just use the cache.
