On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Hedemark, Magnus wrote: > RGB said: > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=5.0 > > tests=AWL,BIG_FONT,CALL_FREE,EXCUSE_3,EXCUSE_7, > > HTML_COMMENT_SAVED_URL,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_08_13 > > version=2.44 > > X-Spam-Level: **** > > There is part of your problem; upgrade your SA. 2.6 is much more accurate, > especially if you take a couple of hours to train your Bayes filters up > front. > > I'm getting nearly 100% accuracy on my home server using 2.6. I have had > *no* good email flagged as spam yet. I've had a few spams get under the > radar, but I'm being very conservative and only flagging as spam if the > score is >=8 (the default is 5). Humm, as a yum user and physics department human, I don't upgrade MY spam assassin. But Seth might upgrade OUR SA:-). rgb -- Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb@xxxxxxxxxxxx