> Ah. The docs have changed since pkgpolicy=last was introduced, or I > have a poor memory. Probably the latter...especially since I've > 'luckily' had alphabetized config files for the past several months, and > so things have worked mostly the way I thought they should. > > Ok, if I consider these things wrong behavior, will a patch that adds an > additional choice that makes yum behave the way I would expect on both > counts be accepted? And should I call it "last-and-I-really-mean-it"? ;-) I don't understand - once you know how yum sorts the server list how is this behavior not working as expected. If you think you're going to get configparser to spit back the sections in the "physically" last order in the file you're dreaming. -sv
