[Yum] Re: Weird yum behaviour maybe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> So you are saying it is totally dependant on the order??

why yes, yes I am.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50977

all the gory details :)


> I assume that given above you do not need the -d10 yum output?? :-)

nope.


> FWIW 
> (tigger pts2) $ rpm -q rpm
> rpm-4.1-1.06
> (tigger pts2) $
> 
> In the previous message you say: 
> Also - if you can - update 8.0 to rpm 4.1.1 and just use yum 1.97(or one
> of the dailies)

> Are there any disadvantages to doing this?

from what I understand, no.

but I've not actually tested it personally. I've heard multiple reports
of its functioning

ask rpm-list

they know these things.

-sv



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux