On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 08:32, Piero Calucci wrote: > On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 14:03, seth vidal wrote: > > I should probably catch this error and exit more gracefully. But what > > did you expect to happen? I think it should be taken as read that an rpm > > needs to be an rpm :) > > uh... well maybe yum-arch could complain the rpm is not an rpm and then > go on with other files I dunno about going on - It could potentially make for a dangerous situation on the client-side. Consider if it missed an important update that caused a lot of other things to fail to update. I think exiting with a more graceful error makes a lot more sense than continuing and ignoring the problem. -sv
