On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 10:05, nathan r. hruby wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > currently yum dislikes empty repositories. Although this is the sane > > thing to do, some cases arise where you may want a repository to be > > empty, e.g. when you have multiple repositories and are shifting parts > > from one to the other (think of stability repositories, where suddenly > > all packages are either stable or bleeding and none is testing). > > > > Could yum be tought to accept these silly repos? ;) > > > > One step ahead of 'ya :) > > https://devel.linux.duke.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19 > Yah - this is on "the list" for 1.0.2 and 1.99. -sv