On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 00:10, Tom Diehl wrote: > On 24 Feb 2003, seth vidal wrote: > > > So this has me positively baffled. > > > > In one section you get: > > > > Updating: kernel > > > > which would sound like it found a new kernel. > > > > Updating: kernel, athlon > > Found best kernel arch: athlon > > > > Is this an athlon? > > yes > > > > > Here is where it gets weird. > > > > When we get down to the part where it lists the stuff it's going to do: > > [Update: pkgname] > > > > kernel is never listed. > > and it should be > > it should be listed as [Install: kernel] > > I see "Installing: kernel, athlon" in the new file at line 5163. Is that > what you were looking for?? > Right but I don't see [Install: kernel] also - could you run rpm -q kernel and send me the output b/c I'm not seeing that release tag anywhere other than the last line, and well, that's odd. it should be in there _SOMEWHERE_ other than there. > Let me know what else you need. I am going to hold off updating this machine > pending your analysis. I am afraid if I ignore the kernel and update it, > it might "fix the problem" and we will not be able to tell what really > happened. send me the rpm -q kernel that'll be helpful, I think. -sv
