On 20 Feb 2003, seth vidal wrote: > as I wrote the parsing for that list and as I got an email from "An > Authority" about rpmrc, I was thinking I'll just put the lists in > manually, but completely, based on the current rpmrc. > It makes it easier to understand and/or edit and if the rpmrc goes away > I'm just going to have to redo it anyway. no worries -- the rpmrc comment is not surprising, but out of scope on this list. I cannot see it happening in an rpm-4.x series without a lot of (presently not needed) pain on transition tools -- certainly not in rpm-4.2.0 -- and so not for some time. - Russ herrold
