[Yum] arch lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--=-NDAh/Pc0T+fEGk7OJ8HT
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Some interesting results, but they don't appear to be incorrect.
>=20
> Looking for some assistance on verification b/c I don't know all of the
> archs.
>=20
> The output I got was:


I'm going to highlight the ones I have questions about:

> Base - i386 : noarch i486 osfmach3_i386 osfmach3_i486 i586 osfmach3_i586 =
i686 osfmach3_i486 osfmach3_i686 osfmach3_i586=20

So that seems odd - I see from the list that osfmach3_* is indeed compat
with i386 - still seems odd

> Base - s390 : noarch=20
> Base - s390x : s390 noarch=20

Is this consistent? It appears to be from the lists, but...

> Base - ia64 : i686 noarch osfmach3_i686 athlon=20
This is just odd - why does athlon and osfmach3_i686 get onto this list?

> Base - x86_64 : noarch=20

otherwise this performs as expected - having said that - for the
purposes of what yum has to do it'd almost be easier to maintain the
lists in archwork.py as I have it on some authority that rpmrc might not
be there in future releases of rpm.


Questions, comments? suggestions?

thanks
-sv


--=-NDAh/Pc0T+fEGk7OJ8HT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+VAoK1Aj3x2mIbMcRAjvbAKCtASWswZYN5b9JgICGvuN0ebN8kACgnSpc
q8cRBaEQVisl8DVCW2bAOnM=
=0vf+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-NDAh/Pc0T+fEGk7OJ8HT--



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux