On 18 Feb 2003, seth vidal wrote: > So I was just looking at the client side to make sure this is > possible/makes sense. > > It does. However, You're going to download a lot of headers that will > have little or no use to your arch b/c they won't work. > > I'll have to look at it some more but there is no reason why you need to > download all those headers. I could simply do a list of archs and say > "if it ain't one of these, toss it out and don't bother downloading it" > > it's all one relatively simple function that does this. Yeah, that would be a nice feature, let "yum update" only download the headers for its own architecture ... For now, I will test it as it is :-) Eddie --
