while this is probably supposed to be obvious, i want to update my yum doc and i want to clarify the different flavors of RPMs. different yum repositories sometimes have subtlely different directory layouts but the general structure of RPMs in terms of stability seems to be: updates/ updates-testing/ stable/ testing/ unstable/ as i read it, the definitions are: updates/ approved updates to distro-included RPMs updates-testing/ test updates to distro-included RPMs (that is, equivalent to rawhide but only for those RPMs that came with the distro in the first place) stable/ stable add-ons testing/ test versions of add-ons(?) unstable/ even more bleeding-edge versions of add-ons(?) is this about right? are these categories actually defined anywhere? and how does a package graduate from testing or unstable to stable? whose decision is it? just curious about the details. rday
