On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:20:13PM +0200, Ragnar Kj?rstad wrote: > "yum upgrade kernel" failed to find the new kernel as well a little > earlier, but now it installes 2.4.20-20.9 - I guess RedHat just released > a new kernel-upgrade. > > And "yum upgrade" still fails after the kernel-upgrade, as > kernel-2.4.20-20.9 doesn't provide /boot/vmlinux-2.4.20-19.23.rh9.at. On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 10:20:40AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > That doesn't explain why the new version doesn't show up on "yum list > > *kernel*", does it? > > actually it doesn't. what does explanit it is that the at kernels are > behind and therefore not as 'new' as the red hat 2.4.20-20.9 kernels. That also crossed my mind, but Ragnar was also seeing the problem before the new RH kernel hit the repos (if I understand the above paragraph right). Anyway a new atrpms kernel is underway with XFS 1.3.0, so let's see if that makes it (OT: anyone willing to join testing -> private mail). -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20030824/63b21834/attachment.bin
