On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 10:19, Troy Dawson wrote: > Hi Seth, > Connie was out sick, and I had e-mail trouble, sorry for the delay. > To me this looks very nice. It is a little different than we expected, we > sortof just expect the rpm's to be listed, but I like the way you list the > groups, then rpm's. sick is no fun. Sorry. email trouble is no fun. Sorry. :) > It does get a little messy when you have groups with 'mandatory groups' > Is there any way we could just say 'groups' and 'packages', I think that would > make things more clear, but that is just my opinion. > I'll let Connie say what she thinks, she should be in today. well my only concern is that it would be misleading - specifically b/c the optional pkgs and optional metapkgs don't get installed in a yum groupinstall command. However, it might be reasonable to just put a special char next to each package or group based on it's type so output something like: yum grouplist foo Group: foo Groups: Somemandatorygroup * somedefaultgroup/metapkg + someoptionalgroup/metapkg Packages: somemandatorypkg * somedefaultpkg + someoptionalgarbage -sv
