I can't think of any reason this isn't a Good Thing(tm). Unfortunately, it's easy for us (especially me) take for granted the fact that the packages we're installing are what they say they are. I don't think having one extra layer of insurance by default is bad at all. On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, seth vidal wrote: > Hi all, > So someone was kinda bugging me about making gpg sig checking a > mandatory DEFAULT. I wanted to hear y'all responses. > > What if gpgcheck=1 was the default and if you set gpgcheck=0 yum would > warn you about the danger of such actions? > > How annoying would that be to everyone? > > And would it really matter? > > are gpgsigs as ignored as I think they are? > > -sv > > > _______________________________________________ > Yum mailing list > Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum >
