--=-r4KyhjSH9dLL4p3c9WQd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable One thing that would be cool is the ability to require a particular signature or one of a group of signatures. There's no way to do that now, right? On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 12:50, seth vidal wrote: > Hi all, > So someone was kinda bugging me about making gpg sig checking a > mandatory DEFAULT. I wanted to hear y'all responses. >=20 > What if gpgcheck=3D1 was the default and if you set gpgcheck=3D0 yum woul= d > warn you about the danger of such actions? >=20 > How annoying would that be to everyone? >=20 > And would it really matter? >=20 > are gpgsigs as ignored as I think they are? >=20 > -sv >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Yum mailing list > Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum --=20 Miles Egan <miles@xxxxxxxxx> --=-r4KyhjSH9dLL4p3c9WQd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+lcwnU4Jq/wH1PVERAkwUAKDro6MqeLFb8YuDk5LtJxht3oeiAgCfbvpp zYZanXDLK65t/TepJIF/HSA= =Deeh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-r4KyhjSH9dLL4p3c9WQd--
