[Yum] Couple of additional (tiny) feature requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--=-iqsf277PFevo6BwKOgc2
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 10:51, Troy Dawson wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 10:11, Andrew Schretter wrote:
> >=20
> >>Seth,
> >>   A couple of tiny additions would make things work smoother on some
> >>scripts I'm writing.
> >>
> >>yum info packagename
> >>
> >>does not report {arch} or {group}.  Can you possibly add these to the i=
nfo
> >>page (at least arch).
> >>
> >=20
> > Sure - that shouldn't be too bad at all.
> >=20
> >=20
> >>The other request is equally stupid, but I can't seem to get info out=20
> >>of yum for the extras packages.
> >>
> >>If there is a package that comes up in :
> >>
> >>yum list extras
> >>
> >>then yum info packagename does not give info on it.
> >=20
> >=20
> > weird. that works for me.
> >=20
> > -sv
> >=20
> Me Too
> *Troy laugh's histerically*
> Oh sorry, just had to say that ... just that kind of a day.
>=20
> Anyway, The yum info packagename works for me for an 'extra' package.
> Just thought I'd let ya know that it isn't just seth's machine that it's=20
> working on.
> Troy
>=20

its yum info extras that he wants to work - which is correct - it does
work :)

-sv


--=-iqsf277PFevo6BwKOgc2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA9sCBO1Aj3x2mIbMcRArCLAJ4roV9H5EBm6/PrTQDkKhB6+vGRTACgmfJ9
y6KtWQw+VlteVswSpwM+B5E=
=Qcxb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-iqsf277PFevo6BwKOgc2--



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux