[Yum] yum.conf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--=-fnLeQB0+M0JitrBdbGq9
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Is there some simple way to fix this that I'm ignorant of EXCEPT to do
> it inside a yum-like tool that can do the requisite marking and
> dependency resolution all at one time before proceeding?

in the case kdesdk-devel - remove it - I did. nothing depends on it.
in the case of sendmail-smrsh - I can put an obsolete in the rpm for 7.3
- but this is NOT the place to discuss that.


> That would be a tolerable approach, but what does Red Hat do when one
> selects the "upgrade" option in a 7.3 reinstall?  It does the wrong
> thing in some ways (trashing and rebuilding the base filesystem,
> trashing key configuration files) but it does the right thing as far as
> package selection.  In fact, I'd say that this "defines" the right thing
> for yum to do if one enters a newly defined "yum upgrade".


1. red hat puts "remove this shite" messages in their release-notes -
check out the release notes for 7.2 and 7.3 - you'll note a little
"remove all ximian stuff" in there.

2. In certain cases they fudge it, in other cases they bail.


=20
-sv


--=-fnLeQB0+M0JitrBdbGq9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA9D08x1Aj3x2mIbMcRAqo+AKCMobAp1PKnLirnTCKUrZY9BwcgIQCgpA3S
Yzx9XUDNWe2oIllh/bfyD30=
=Ecmm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-fnLeQB0+M0JitrBdbGq9--



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux