[Yum] arch resolve

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--=-0OWSewUvRN1rXKzOH47c
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


>=20
> black% sudo yum install
>  Gathering package information from servers
>  Finding updated packages
>  Downloading needed headers
>  Finding obsoleted packages
>  Resolving dependencies
>  Dependencies resolved
>  I will do the following:
>  [install: dillo.i386]
>  [install: dillo.i686]
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
>  Getting dillo-0.6.6-5.asp.i386.rpm
>  Getting dillo-0.6.6-5.asp.i686.rpm
>  Transaction(s) Complete

ah. I see the problem. On installs I had told it to put in the package
(name, arch) - I should have told it (name, bestarch)

more or less a thinko.

thanks for pointing it out.

I've fixed it in cvs now and I'll put together a new tarball/rpm today.

I've also fixed a few other bugs and I _might_ be handling some
conflicts more like anaconda handles them.

In case anyone is interested I've done a rhl 7.1 -> 7.3 upgrade and a
rhl 7.2->7.3 upgrade with yum and both have worked. (well, provided the
user had already patched in rpm 4.0.4 to both :-)

let me know what else breaks.
thanks

-sv


--=-0OWSewUvRN1rXKzOH47c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA9BeUU1Aj3x2mIbMcRAoXrAJoCMG9Nk85R8GATu0+Si8VBOgbCAACfVg0r
32w7MyhKVDX8uHZq5DGSY/c=
=nwAb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-0OWSewUvRN1rXKzOH47c--



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux