[Crash-utility] Re: [PATCH] symbols: expand kernel modules symtable when loading by mod -s/-S

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/11/15 18:16, Tao Liu wrote:

>> a question, is "mod -S -r" a workaround for it?
>>
> Yes, it can work as expected with "mod -S -r", I didn't know "-r"
> parameter can trigger such symble expansion.

Thank you for the check.

>> I'm thinking that, if the current gdb's auto expansion is not good for
>> crash, maybe we can make the behavior of "mod -r" option default.  The
>> option adds "-readnow" to the add-symbol-file command and it looks same
>> as your patch to me:
>>
>> $ vim gdb-10.2/gdb/symfile.c
>>
>>     /* We now have at least a partial symbol table.  Check to see if the
>>        user requested that all symbols be read on initial access via either
>>        the gdb startup command line or on a per symbol file basis.  Expand
>>        all partial symbol tables for this objfile if so.  */
>>
>>     if ((flags & OBJF_READNOW))
>>       {
>>         if (should_print)
>>           printf_filtered (_("Expanding full symbols from %ps...\n"),
>>                            styled_string (file_name_style.style (), name));
>>
>>         if (objfile->sf)
>>           objfile->sf->qf->expand_all_symtabs (objfile);
>>       }
>>
> Agreed, they do the same work. Thanks again for your suggestions. Do
> you want me to draft the "making mod -r option default" patch now or
> later?

This is an idea, I think it's better to evaluate more whether we can 
make it default.  Any trade-off?  For example, the -r option uses much 
memory..

after startup:
root      327522 53.3  3.9 1814472 545756 pts/2  Sl+  14:05   0:03 crash
after "mod -S":
root      327522 24.9  4.1 1851184 585052 pts/2  Sl+  14:05   0:04 crash
after "mod -D":
root      327522 19.6  4.1 1843360 578408 pts/2  Sl+  14:05   0:04 crash
after "mod -S -r":
root      327522 23.3 11.6 2884148 1621016 pts/2 Sl+  14:05   0:11 crash

This seems too much and a bit dangerous to make it default..  So I think 
it's better to try to search for another way with the on-demand 
expansion if possible.

BTW, according to your commit log,

> !objfile_has_full_symbols(objfile) check will fail, so it cannot display
> the proper code line number data.

this check seems a fault, is there no way to improve this?

Thanks,
Kazu
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

 

Powered by Linux