Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/1] add loongarch64 platform support.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:24 PM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) <k-hagio-ab@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2023/07/27 21:28, Ming Wang wrote:
> This patch are for Crash-utility tool, it make crash tool support on
> loongarch64 architecture and the common commands(bt, p, rd, mod, log, set,
> dis, and so on).
>
> The upstream GDB code supports the loongarch64 architecture from version 13.1.
> See: https://sourceware.org/gdb/download/ANNOUNCEMENT
> But Crash-utility depends on gdb-10.2, gdb-10.2 do NOT supported loongarch64.
> So we need a patch(gdb-10.2-loongarch.patch) to support it. I don't have a better
> way to deal with this problem at the moment.

I have not seen the patch yet, but personally I don't have a plan to
rebase the embedded gdb for now and a rebase work is so hard, so if a
gdb patch works well for LoongArch, probably I will be able to accept it.

Lianbo, do you have any plan to rebase the embedded gdb?

Sorry for the late reply, Kazu and Ming Wang.

For the time being, I don't have any plans to rebase the latest gdb for the crash-utility.

And having a gdb patch for the LoongArch64 should be good. I will put the patch in my queue.

Thanks.
Lianbo
 
Usually we don't maintain two crash versions, so if we rebase it now,
RHEL9 crash will need a lot of backport efforts or major version
rebasing.  I think maybe it's too early.

Thanks,
Kazu
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

 

Powered by Linux