On 2023/06/01 18:52, lijiang wrote: > On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 4:09 PM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) <k-hagio-ab@xxxxxxx> > wrote: > >>> Is it possible to put the [patch 09/15] and [patch 10/15] together? They >>> have similar changes. >> >> Sure. >> >> > Thanks. > > >> >>> >>> Similarly, recursive function again. I have one question about it: how >> does >>> it affect the performance when the recursion is deep enough? If it is not >>> too deep, that should be good. >> >> As I wrote in 09/15, it just looks recursive. >> > > It's really not easy to understand the *recursive*. True, will split this too. Thanks, Kazu > > The depth is 2 at most. >> > > Ok, sounds good. > > Thanks. > Lianbo > -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki