Re: [PATCH] Fix kernel version macros for revision numbers over 255

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 9:51 AM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) <k-hagio-ab@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Do you mean the following changes can not work?
>
> #define THIS_KERNEL_VERSION ((kt->kernel_version[0] << 16) + \
>                               (kt->kernel_version[1] << 8) + \
>                               ((kt->kernel_version[2] > 255) ? 255 :
> (kt->kernel_version[2])))
> #define LINUX(x,y,z) (((uint)(x) << 16) + ((uint)(y) << 8) + ((uint)(z) >
> 255 ? 255 : (uint)(z)))

No, in the current crash, this will work.  Because there is no
if-conditional that checks a revision value over 255.

>     if (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION < LINUX(4,14,300))

But yes, when we need to check like this, the above cannot work.  For
example, THIS_KERNEL_VERSION on 4.14.310 equals to LINUX(4,14,300).


Thank you for the explanation, Kazu.
 
So, my thought is that it would be better to change the shift amounts
now for future changes with the small effort, rather than change it
again in the future.

 
There is a similar discussion in the kernel here, but not sure why it was not accepted.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210206035033.2036180-3-sashal@xxxxxxxxxx/

But anyway, it is just a small change, and also fine to me. So: Ack.

Thanks.
Lianbo
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

 

Powered by Linux