On 2023/02/28 19:56, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> I raised the issue of <sys/cdefs.h> syncing here: >>> >>> Updating <sys/cdefs.h> in glibc and gnulib >>> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-February/145758.html> > > Regarding cdefs.h, there's another aspect that I had missed when I wrote > the aboce: for future 2.34-based distros (CentOS 9 Stream today, Red Hat > Enterprise Linux 9.2 when it comes out), I believe the gnulib/glibc > cdefs.h handshake has been fixed with a glibc change: the glibc header > now defines the __attribute_nonnull__ macro, which gnulib uses as an > indicator that the header is recent enough, so it won't interpose its > own version. So hopefully this is going to be more stable in the > future, and future such syncs become less necessary. Good, thanks for the info. >> True, but there is no plan to update the embedded GDB for now and it >> would be better to sync with the upstream code just in case, so I've >> updated some hunks like so. Does the attached patch work for you? > > I can confirm this patch passes build testing with an instrumented > compiler that logs C99 compatibility issues. Thanks again for testing, will apply it when Lianbo acks. Thanks, Kazu -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
